Susanna would have been around 60 when James Cooke visited her and they argued about whether or not a manuscript Cooke wanted to acquire had been written by her husband. I wonder if her eyesight was poor (cataracts?) and she was past recognising his handwriting, rather than unable to. Even so, it's definitely odd that a rising citizen like Mr Shakspere didn't arrange some education for his daughters, if only enough to read books on huswifery, and write down recipes.
I think it would be interesting for you to watch my videos (about my book "Debugging Shakespeare") - which make the claim that the man we call "Shakespeare" (and probably called himself at some time!), was born in the salt town of Nantwich, Cheshire. Here is a link to my playlist called "Bard Videos", which initially use an avatar voice - but later I switch to my own voice (which is an improvement I think).
Nearly 100% is brand new research and discovery. I find it staggering how much evidence has been missed during research on the bard. Along the way, I even discovered that John Milton was most likely a son of the bard. This is, of course, history changing if true, and I suggest you are not one of the ostriches that I keep coming across who don't want to listen to the arguments!
The YouTube videos are a tiny fraction of the 330,000 word book and don’t go into much detail. I mentioned the Milton connection - which is not known about - but I haven’t properly announced the John Donne connection or the Isaac Newton connections yet!
I have however hinted at the John Dryden connection. I have documented genealogical charts supporting these associations that are too large to present in an easily digested form.
I have also personally seen original manuscripts in various institutions who don’t know what they have yet because they are not signed by the bard in his “own” name of course.
I made a new video yesterday about the Llanrwst bridge and almshouses that you may find interesting. Thank you for responding
My latest video examines the genealogical relationship of the polymath, "William Shakespeare", with his likely progeny (sons, grandsons ...). It seems clear that there is a clear "genius gene" associated with the bard - such that he was the progenitor of many of our "renaissance scientists" and artists - who literally defined that period.
John Milton, John Wilkins, Walter Pope and even Sir Isaac Newton - to name but a few that are documented from existing genealogical documents.
I am holding back on quite a few others - for the time being - because of the "incredulity" and implications of it all in just one "session". You can either participate or simply ignore these revelations - it's up to you - but I believe they are genuine and hitherto largely unexplored.
Susanna would have been around 60 when James Cooke visited her and they argued about whether or not a manuscript Cooke wanted to acquire had been written by her husband. I wonder if her eyesight was poor (cataracts?) and she was past recognising his handwriting, rather than unable to. Even so, it's definitely odd that a rising citizen like Mr Shakspere didn't arrange some education for his daughters, if only enough to read books on huswifery, and write down recipes.
Dear Dr. Williams,
I think it would be interesting for you to watch my videos (about my book "Debugging Shakespeare") - which make the claim that the man we call "Shakespeare" (and probably called himself at some time!), was born in the salt town of Nantwich, Cheshire. Here is a link to my playlist called "Bard Videos", which initially use an avatar voice - but later I switch to my own voice (which is an improvement I think).
Nearly 100% is brand new research and discovery. I find it staggering how much evidence has been missed during research on the bard. Along the way, I even discovered that John Milton was most likely a son of the bard. This is, of course, history changing if true, and I suggest you are not one of the ostriches that I keep coming across who don't want to listen to the arguments!
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwrpViIj8rNgU4e7RBcqHsTct2Z1Ttv07
I have indeed watched several of your videos, DEB! Very interesting, but too speculative for my personal tastes. But carry on!
I am pleased to pronounce you a non-ostrich
The YouTube videos are a tiny fraction of the 330,000 word book and don’t go into much detail. I mentioned the Milton connection - which is not known about - but I haven’t properly announced the John Donne connection or the Isaac Newton connections yet!
I have however hinted at the John Dryden connection. I have documented genealogical charts supporting these associations that are too large to present in an easily digested form.
I have also personally seen original manuscripts in various institutions who don’t know what they have yet because they are not signed by the bard in his “own” name of course.
I made a new video yesterday about the Llanrwst bridge and almshouses that you may find interesting. Thank you for responding
https://youtu.be/-rCX-i-zTU8?si=sZm0IehTURRe7dsh
Best Wishes,
Decimus
My latest video examines the genealogical relationship of the polymath, "William Shakespeare", with his likely progeny (sons, grandsons ...). It seems clear that there is a clear "genius gene" associated with the bard - such that he was the progenitor of many of our "renaissance scientists" and artists - who literally defined that period.
John Milton, John Wilkins, Walter Pope and even Sir Isaac Newton - to name but a few that are documented from existing genealogical documents.
I am holding back on quite a few others - for the time being - because of the "incredulity" and implications of it all in just one "session". You can either participate or simply ignore these revelations - it's up to you - but I believe they are genuine and hitherto largely unexplored.
https://youtu.be/eJPZGrXuVi8?si=q4UBWEvYkZUQ23we